Pillbox Type 24 (Shell-proof) at Barcombe [Find others in East Sussex]
Serial numbers/identifiers
DESPro: 1983
Defence of Britain Project: 759
East Sussex HER: MES7699
Wartime Serial/Post No.: A245
Location
Cassini Grid: wQ 876 348
National Grid: TQ 440 159
Access
Private property, but visible from a distance
DISCLAIMER: Based on best available information - accuracy NOT guarenteed, neither is site access. The Defence of East Sussex Project DOES NOT condone trespassing - make your own enquiries first! More...
| DESPro | Location | Feature | Cassini Grid | Age | Status |
| 1982 | Barcombe |
Pillbox Type 24 (Shell-proof)
[A248]
|
wQ 872 341 | 1940? | |
| 1979 | Barcombe |
Pillbox Type 24 (Shell-proof)
[A247]
|
wQ 875 344 | 1940? | |
| 1983 | Barcombe |
Pillbox Type 24 (Shell-proof)
[A245]
|
wQ 876 348 | 1940? | |
Certain data on this page are being witheld to protect against plagiarism.
The information on this website is intended solely to describe the ongoing research activity of The Defence of East Sussex Project; it is not comprehensive or properly presented. It is therefore NOT suitable as a basis for producing derivative works or surveys!
Copyright © Peter Hibbs 2006 - 2010.
Cassini Grid Square wQ 87 34
Reproduced from the 1940 Ordnance Survey map
with the kind permission of the Ordnance Survey
Evidence
Historian's commentsData witheld. |
|
|
|
Surviving Evidence (post-1945) |
|
Visible from the public footpath on the disused railway line, this Type 24 may be numbered A245. |
|
- Photo ID: DSCF7646
- Date: 15/10/2006
- Camera facing: East
- Photographer: Peter Hibbs
- Notes: Pillbox as seen from railway embankment.
Photograph copyright © Peter Hibbs 2006
This site is copyright © Peter Hibbs 2006 - 2010. All rights reserved.
Hibbs, Peter DESPro1983: Pillbox Type 24 (Shell-proof) at Barcombe (2010) Available at: http://www.pillbox.org.uk/concrete_evidence/detail.asp?ID=1983 Accessed: 06 September 2010
The information on this website is intended solely to describe the ongoing research activity of The Defence of East Sussex Project; it is not comprehensive or properly presented. It is therefore NOT suitable as a basis for producing derivative works or surveys!

